Imagine a world where every piece of information is intertwined with another in an intricate dance of associations - this is the realm of functional dependencies in a database. The underpinning of functional dependencies is based around the idea that certain values are dependent on others, a fundamental concept in databases and, in particular, database normalization.
Closure sets and closure operation form the bedrock of identifying functional dependencies in a relational database. The closure set of a set of attributes X, denoted as X+, is the set of all attributes that are functionally dependent on X.
For instance, consider a database table for a library, where 'Book_ID' uniquely identifies a 'Book_Name'. Here, 'Book_Name' is functionally dependent on 'Book_ID', thus we can say that 'Book_Name' is in the closure set of 'Book_ID'.
The closure operation is the process of finding the closure set.
Table: Library
Book_ID Book_Name
1 Harry Potter
2 Pride and Prejudice
In the above example, if we perform the closure operation on the attribute 'Book_ID', we would get the set {Book_ID, Book_Name}.
While in the realm of functional dependencies, we often come across terms like trivial, non-trivial, and semi-trivial functional dependencies.
A trivial functional dependency is when a set of attributes functionally determines a subset of itself. For example, in a database table with attributes {A, B, C}, the functional dependency A -> B is considered trivial because B is a subset of {A, B}.
Non-trivial functional dependencies are the opposite of trivial ones. They occur when a set of attributes determines another set of attributes that is not a subset of the first one. For example, in the library table 'Book_ID' -> 'Book_Name' is a non-trivial functional dependency.
A semi-trivial functional dependency is a less common term, often referring to dependencies where the determinant and dependent sets overlap but the dependent is not a complete subset of the determinant.
Equivalence in functional dependency means that two sets of functional dependencies are equivalent if they imply one another. For instance, if we have two sets of functional dependencies F = {A -> B, B -> C} and G = {A -> C}, F and G are equivalent as they imply each other.
The concept of minimization of functional dependency refers to reducing the redundancy of functional dependencies in a database. Techniques like attribute elimination and the use of Armstrong's Axioms help in achieving this minimization, ensuring a lean and efficient database.
Understanding and analyzing these concepts greatly enhance one's ability to design and work with relational databases, making them key knowledge areas for data scientists and database professionals alike.